Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Henrik Wiersholm vs Tomas Lanik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wiersholm vs Lanik analysis and find out who is favored!
Henrik Wiersholm vs Tomas Lanik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wiersholm has won 44.47% of points on his second serve, while Lanik has won 45.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wiersholm, in recent form, has won 54.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lanik has won 48.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.29% and 28.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wiersholm has saved 57.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lanik has saved 52.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wiersholm has won 63.33% of matches played (W/L 38/ 22), with Lanik winning 50.91% (W/L 28/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wiersholm has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 44/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8). Lanik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 33/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Wiersholm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.41% of matches (W/L 38/ 21), where as Lanik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 28/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wiersholm winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wiersholm winning 2 and Lanik winning 0. The last match between Wiersholm and Lanik was at the M15 Heraklion, 13-03-2024, First, Hard with Henrik Wiersholm getting the victory 6-0 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wiersholm and Lanik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wiersholm winning 0 times and Lanik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wiersholm winning 1, and Lanik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wiersholm has played against opponents with an average rank of 94.98 while Lanik has played against players with an average rank of 90.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wiersholm has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lanik has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wiersholm has converted 46.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lanik has converted 37.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wiersholm 1 - 0 Lanik
723
Rank
718
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
886
Rank
886
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
66% (107-55)
Career Total W/L
54% (84-72)
64% (16-9)
YTD W/L
18% (2-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Henrik Wiersholm | Tomas Lanik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (30/51) | 54% (30/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (23/30) | 50% (15/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (13/21) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (30/56) | 29% (15/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Tomas Lanik
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Henrik Wiersholm | Tomas Lanik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (16/9) | 18% (2/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (33/22) | 27% (7/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (266/238) | 44% (111/140) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:48 | 1:43:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 132.12 | 89.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (910/1407) | 58% (431/748) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (579/910) | 61% (261/431) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (221/497) | 44% (140/317) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (69/147) | 37% (25/67) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (582/1349) | 38% (279/731) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (16/9) | 18% (2/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 18% (2/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 14% (1/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (6/0) |
Henrik Wiersholm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ioannis Xilas
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Orel Kimhi
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Heinonen
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
58%
(
65 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
112)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
32%
(
15 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
112)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Oleg Prihodko
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Corban Crowther
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Tomas Lanik
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Tomas Lanik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tomas Lanik
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Tomas Lanik
60%
(
78 of
131)
1st Serve %
52%
(
65 of
124)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
57 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaya Arinc
Player
Tomas Lanik
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Lanik
Player
Gregorio Biondolillo
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Tomas Lanik
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christos Antonopoulos
Player
Tomas Lanik
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
111)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Tomas Lanik
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Tomas Lanik
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Wiersholm Vs Lanik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
